Printed . This content is updated regularly, please refer back to https://bcfsa.ca to ensure that you are relying on the most up-to-date resources.
Select the section you’d like to navigate to.
BCFSA’s Guidelines provide a practical application of the information and give suggested best practice guidance to assist real estate professionals. These guidelines provide BCFSA’s interpretation of RESA and all other applicable legislation.
In addition, BCFSA’s Guidelines may be a useful information source for the general public looking for information about standards of conduct for real estate professionals.
These guidelines will help you understand how to act in your client’s best interest in situations where your actions may be influenced by actual or potential remuneration. This includes not using remuneration offered by a listing brokerage to filter which properties you are willing to show your client. This also serves as a reminder to be cognizant of the Competition Act in the execution of your obligations and how the Act also serves to protect your client’s interests.
Please note that technically the brokerage negotiates any remuneration or commission rates, even though in practice, brokerages allow real estate professionals to negotiate remuneration. To be consistent with the legislation, these guidelines will always reference remuneration negotiated, earned, and paid by the brokerage. Prudent real estate professionals should always discuss remuneration with their managing broker to ensure that during the negotiation process, they are not offside with brokerage policy.
- Showing properties to buyers based on cooperating remuneration;
- Understanding remuneration restrictions;
- Understanding remuneration disputes and advances.
When searching for properties that match a client’s search parameters, often the databases which advertise the properties include the cooperating commission being offered. It is important to remember that you must always act in your client’s best interest. This includes showing properties your client may be interested in where the seller is offering a lower-than-expected remuneration or no remuneration.
One of the simplest ways to address your commission expectations when representing a buyer is to review with them and request they enter into a buyer agency agreement. By outlining your expectations when it comes to commission at the outset of your agency relationship and agreeing with your client who will compensate you should a seller be offering a commission amount that is below what you charge, you will eliminate the issue of having to represent your client in a transaction where a reduced commission or no commission is being offered by the seller or the seller’s brokerage.
In real estate there is no standard remuneration. Remuneration can be negotiated by you (if you have the authority), your brokerage, and your client. Suggesting to your client that there is a standard is contrary to competition laws. It is also a violation of competition laws to collude with other brokerages to drive up remuneration rates or to discourage other real estate professionals or brokerages from reducing their rates.
The remuneration rates charged by your brokerage should be based on the services provided. You should be able to justify the fees your brokerage charges, whether working with buyers, sellers, strata corporations or owners renting properties regardless of what other real estate professionals in the industry are charging.
The Competition Bureau of Canada is an independent agency that ensures businesses and consumers benefit in a competitive marketplace. The Competition Act outlines what practices are considered anti-competitive and illegal. It also has and has provisions that include both criminal and civil offences.
RESA does not address commission disputes between brokerages or between a brokerage and their real estate professionals. Remuneration earned by a brokerage is paid to their real estate professionals based on their contracts. You can be paid as an employee of the brokerage or an independent contractor. You should speak with your managing broker if a remuneration dispute arises. If the situation cannot be resolved, you may need legal advice.
Case #1: Licensee Had Seller Client Sign an Addendum Stating That the Seller Would Receive Specified Net Proceeds from the Sale and the Licensee Would Receive the Remainder of the Sale Proceeds as a Bonus.
The licensee was a co-listing agent for the seller. The seller signed a listing agreement to list the property for $799,999 and agreed to pay commission to the listing brokerage at 7% on $100,000 and 2.5% on the remainder. The seller entered into a Contract of Purchase and Sale for the Property for $880,000 and then signed an addendum stating that he would receive $825,000 from the sale proceeds and the remainder would be given to the licensee and the co-listing agent as a bonus.
The licensee was found to have committed professional misconduct in that he:
- (1) Failed to act in the best interests of his client when he prepared and had the seller sign an addendum to the Contract of Purchase and Sale stating that the seller would receive net proceeds from the sale and the licensee would receive the remainder of the sale proceeds as a bonus; and
- (2) He acted in a potential conflict of interest and failed to advise the seller to seek independent professional advice in relation to the remainder of the sale proceeds that the licensee would receive as a bonus.
Contraventions: section [Must act in best interests of the client], [Licensee must not request or enter into agreement for remuneration based on difference between listed price and actual price], [Advise the client to seek independent professional advice on matters outside of the expertise of the licensee], [Take reasonable steps to avoid conflict of interest], and section [If conflict of interest does exist, fully disclose to client] of the Real Estate Services Rules (“Rules”).Read the full case
Case #2: Licensee Accepted “Listing Administration Fee” Directly from the Seller, a Person Other than His Brokerage, and Did Not Deliver or Pay the Remuneration Received for Real Estate Services to his Brokerage.
The licensee prepared a multiple listing contract for a property and on Schedule A to the listing stated that the “listing agent will receive a flat commission of $5,000” and “vendor to provide the listing agent with a $250 listing administration fee.” The seller prepared a cheque dated August 7, 2009 for $250 and left the payee blank but provided the cheque to the licensee. On February 8, 2010, the listing expired and on February 9, 2010, the licensee deposited the cheque into his personal account. The seller stated that his understanding was that the cheque would not be cashed unless the property was sold. The licensee thought that the administration fee was to cover the costs associated with listing the property and was not based on the sale of the property, thus why he had reduced his commission owing upon sale of the property. The licensee’s managing broker told the seller that the up-front administrative fee was to ensure that some of the costs associated with listing the property are covered in the event the property does not sell. The licensee mistakenly believed that this administration fee would not be considered as remuneration for real estate services.
The licensee was found to have committed professional misconduct in that he:
- Accepted remuneration from a person other than his brokerage and failed to promptly pay or deliver remuneration received for real estate services to his brokerage; he accepted remuneration for real estate services directly from the seller and deposited that remuneration into his own personal account rather than delivering same to his brokerage; and
- Failed to apply reasonable care and skill in that he failed to clarify, in writing, the details and circumstances under which the $250.00 listing administration fee would apply.
Contraventions: section [Licensee must deliver or pay all money held or received as remuneration to the brokerage], section [Licensee must not accept remuneration from any other person other than brokerage] of the Real Estate Services Act; and section [Reasonable care and skill] of the Real Estate Services Rules.Read the full case
All remuneration being paid to your real estate professionals must be paid through your brokerage with a few exceptions. A real estate professional is not permitted to collect any remuneration (monetary or otherwise) directly from a client or third party. Your brokerage policies and procedures manual should include information about remuneration, required disclosures, advances and any brokerage policies on referrals.
It is also suggested that your real estate professionals understand the difference in how the brokerage holds funds in as a stakeholder in a resale transaction or commercial lease, as a trustee in a pre-sale transaction, and in a residential rental property management transaction where deposits are held for the benefit of the landlord. Each scenario has specific requirements for withdrawing funds from trust and may affect when funds are considered earned and can be paid as remuneration.
When it comes to commission advances on pre-sale transactions, the Real Estate Services Rules provide that money held by a brokerage that is not stakeholder money, may be withdrawn in accordance with a service agreement or other agreement under which the applicable real estate services are provided.
When a developer offers to pay a commission advance, the real estate professional is usually presented with and asked to sign, on behalf of their brokerage, an agreement that sets out the terms under which the commission is being advanced, including the provision that in the event that the deal does not complete, the brokerage will repay that amount. As such, if the brokerage then pays out the advanced commission to the real estate professional, the brokerage itself has taken on a contingent liability to repay the advance, in the event of a collapsed sale. It is important to seek independent professional advice when considering the implications of a commission advance.
BCFSA has a policy statement outlining the differences in how remuneration must be handled for those paid by salary compared to those paid on commission.
- Section 3, RESA, Requirement for license to provide real estate services
- Section 4, RESA, No recovery of remuneration by unlicensed person
- Section 7, RESA, Relationships between brokerages and other licensees
- Section 27, RESA, Payment into trust account
- Section 31, RESA, Payment of licensee remuneration
- Section 43, Real Estate Services Rules, Written service agreements required in some cases
- Section 56, Real Estate Services Rules, Disclosure of Remuneration
- Section 57, Real Estate Services Rules, Disclosure to Sellers of Expected Remuneration
- Section 60, Real Estate Services Rules, Remuneration restriction in relation to trades in real estate
- Section 61, Real Estate Services Rules, When licensee remuneration can be paid out of trust account
- Section 62, Real Estate Rules, Some remuneration not required to be paid into brokerage trust account
Remuneration: includes any form of remuneration, including any commission, fee, gain or reward, whether the remuneration is received, or is to be received, directly or indirectly.